Equivalence Partitioning Testing

Equivalence Partitioning Testing

by

Equivalence Partitioning Testing is a software testing technique used to reduce the number of test cases needed to adequately test a system or application while ensuring that all important conditions are covered. The technique is based on the assumption that input values or conditions can be divided into partitions or groups that are equivalent in terms of behavior or output.

What is Equivalence Partitioning Testing?

Equivalence Partitioning testing is a black-box testing technique used to identify and reduce the number of test cases required to adequately test a system or application. The technique involves dividing the input values or conditions into equivalent partitions, where each partition has the same behavior or output. This allows testers to select a representative set of input values or conditions from each partition to test the system.

The purpose of Equivalence Partitioning is to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the testing process by reducing the number of test cases that need to be executed while still ensuring that all important conditions are covered.

The Equivalence Partitioning testing is based on the assumption that if one input value or condition from a partition behaves a certain way, then all other input values or conditions within that partition will behave in the same way. Conversely, if an input value or condition from one partition behaves differently than other partitions, then it is assumed that other input values or conditions within that partition will behave in the same way as the one that was tested.

To apply Equivalence Partitioning, the input values or conditions must be classified into two categories: valid and invalid. Valid input values or conditions are those that the system or application should accept and process, while invalid input values or conditions are those that the system or application should reject or produce an error message for.

Once the input values or conditions have been classified, they can be further divided into equivalent partitions. For example, if the input values are numbers, they can be divided into partitions such as positive, negative, zero, and non-numeric values.

Test cases can then be selected from each partition to ensure that all important conditions are covered. For example, if the partition is positive numbers, a test case could be selected with a value of 1, as well as a test case with a value of the largest positive number that the system can handle.

Equivalence Partitioning Testing Example

Equivalence partitioning testing is a software testing technique that involves dividing the input data into groups or partitions, where each partition should behave similarly and produce the same output. This technique is useful in reducing the number of test cases required to test a system while still ensuring comprehensive testing.

Here is an example of equivalence partitioning testing:

Suppose you are testing a registration form for a website that requires users to enter their age. The form has a validation rule that users must be at least 18 years old to register.

The possible input values for the age field are:

  • Any value less than 18
  • 18 (minimum allowed age)
  • Any value between 18 and 60 (valid ages)
  • Any value above 60

To apply equivalence partitioning testing, you would create four partitions based on the above input values:

Partition 1: Age less than 18

Partition 2: Age equal to 18

Partition 3: Age between 18 and 60

Partition 4: Age greater than 60

For each partition, you would select a representative value to test. For example, for partition 1, you could select 17 as the representative value, and for partition 3, you could select 35 as the representative value.

You would then test each representative value for its expected behavior. For example, when testing the representative value of partition 1 (17), the expected behavior would be for the system to reject the age and display an error message stating that the user must be at least 18 years old to register.

By testing a representative value from each partition, you can ensure that the system is behaving correctly for all possible input values, without having to test every single value individually.

Equivalence Partitioning Testing and Boundary Value Analysis

Equivalence Partitioning testing and Boundary Value Analysis are two important testing techniques used in software testing to identify defects and errors in software applications.

Equivalence Partitioning testing is a black box testing technique that involves dividing the input domain of a software application into a set of equivalent classes or partitions. Each partition represents a group of inputs that are expected to behave in the same way or produce the same output. The goal of equivalence partitioning is to identify a representative set of inputs from each partition that can be used to test the software application’s functionality.

Boundary Value Analysis is another black box testing technique that focuses on testing the boundaries of input values. The idea behind this technique is that errors are more likely to occur at the boundary values of input parameters rather than within the range of valid input values. The testing team selects the values that lie on or just outside the boundaries of input values and then tests the software application’s behavior for these values.

To better understand these techniques, let’s consider an example. Suppose we have a software application that accepts an input value between 1 and 100. Using equivalence partitioning, we can divide the input domain into three partitions – values less than 1, values between 1 and 100, and values greater than 100. We can then select one representative value from each partition, such as -1, 50, and 101, to test the software application’s behavior.

Using boundary value analysis, we can select values that are on or just outside the boundaries of the input domain, such as 1, 100, and 101, and test the software application’s behavior for these values. This can help identify any errors or defects that may occur at the boundary values.

Both techniques can be used together to complement each other’s strengths and weaknesses. Equivalence partitioning can help identify input values that are likely to produce similar behavior, while boundary value analysis can help identify errors that may occur at the boundaries of input values.

Advantages of Equivalence Partitioning Testing

There are several advantages of using equivalence partitioning testing, including:

  1. Efficiency: Equivalence partitioning helps to reduce the number of test cases required to test a system, while still providing comprehensive test coverage. By dividing input data into partitions, you can test representative values from each partition, rather than testing every possible value, which can save time and resources.
  2. Early detection of defects: Equivalence partitioning can help detect defects early in the testing process. By identifying input values that are likely to cause errors, you can test them early on, before more complex functionality is implemented.
  3. Improved test coverage: Equivalence partitioning ensures that all input values are covered by at least one test case, which helps to improve test coverage and reduces the risk of missing defects.
  4. Better prioritization of test cases: By focusing on representative values from each partition, you can prioritize your test cases based on their importance. This helps to ensure that the most critical functionality is tested first, which can reduce the risk of defects in production.
  5. Increased productivity: Equivalence partitioning helps to streamline the testing process by reducing the number of test cases required. This can improve the productivity of the testing team, allowing them to focus on other critical tasks.

Other Popular Articles

Leave a Comment